Interactive Decision Tool

Power Apps Decision Tree

Answer seven questions about your scenario and get a tailored recommendation for which Power Apps app type, data store, and licensing model to use.

1
Who will use this app?

Understanding the primary user group shapes the UI, deployment model, and licensing approach.

App Type Comparison Matrix

A side-by-side reference for all Power Apps app types and the key factors that differentiate them.

Capability Canvas App Model-Driven App Code App Power Pages Custom Web App
UI Control Full control (drag-and-drop + Power Fx) Limited — component-based, platform-driven layout Full control (TypeScript + modern frameworks such as React or Vue) Template-based + Liquid customisation Total control (any framework)
Data Store Dataverse, SharePoint, SQL, 400+ connectors Dataverse only Dataverse + 1,500+ Power Platform connectors via SDK Dataverse Any (Azure SQL, Cosmos DB, etc.)
Offline Support Managed offline (Dataverse); basic local caching (SaveData / LoadData) without Dataverse Managed mobile offline (Dataverse) No native managed offline. Custom offline is possible using standard web techniques (service workers, browser storage), but must be built and maintained by the development team No Custom (service workers / local storage)
Mobile Native Feel Strong — runs in Power Apps mobile player Good — responsive, Power Apps mobile player Browser only — no native mobile wrapper yet Responsive web If built for it (PWA / native wrappers)
Camera / GPS / Barcode Native controls Via custom PCF components Via browser APIs Limited Full browser APIs
Row-Level Security Depends on data store (Dataverse = yes; SharePoint = no) Dataverse RLS — business units, teams, roles Dataverse RLS Web roles + table permissions Custom implementation required
Business Process Flows No Native support No No Custom build
Speed to Build Fast (low-code, drag-and-drop) Very fast for Dataverse-centric CRUD and back-office forms Moderate — requires TypeScript and modern web framework skills Fast for portal scenarios (templates) Slowest — full-stack development required
Responsive by Default Only if designed for it Automatic Developer controlled Template-based Developer controlled
Solution-Aware ALM Yes for the app and app components; backend ALM depends on the data source (Dataverse = first-class; SharePoint = manual) Yes — straightforward, first-class support Yes — solution-aware deployment Yes — solutions Git / CI-CD (no Power Platform solution packaging)
Enterprise Integration Layer Via connectors / Power Automate Dataverse APIs, plug-ins, Azure service bus 1,500+ Power Platform connectors via SDK, Dataverse, custom APIs Dataverse APIs Azure Functions, API Management, any middleware
Min. Licence M365 included rights (standard connectors) or Premium Power Apps Premium or Per App Power Apps Premium or Per App Power Pages capacity (authenticated / anonymous MAU) None (Azure / hosting costs only)
Best For Mobile data capture, task apps, frontline Back-office CRUD, process-driven workflows, data-dense management Branded custom UI with Dataverse + 1,500+ connectors, pro-dev teams External-facing portals, partner/customer self-service Fully bespoke apps with zero platform dependency

Note: Code apps are a distinct code-first app model for building custom web apps connected to Power Platform. PCF (Power Apps component framework) is a separate technology for creating reusable components that can be embedded within canvas or model-driven apps.

Data Store Comparison

Choosing the right backend is just as important as choosing the app type. The data layer is where security, scale, and ALM are enforced — not the app.

Factor SharePoint Dataverse SQL Server / Azure SQL Azure Blob Storage Azure Functions + API Layer
Licence Required Included with M365 Power Apps Premium / Per App Premium connector + Azure costs Premium connector + Azure costs Premium connector (custom) + Azure costs
Row-Level Security No native RLS — item-level permissions do not scale Native — business units, teams, security roles RLS policies available Container-level ACLs only Custom auth middleware
Record Scale 5,000-item view threshold; degrades with item-level perms Millions of records Millions+ records Petabytes (blob storage) Depends on backing store
File / Image Storage Excellent — purpose-built for documents Expensive — consumes Dataverse file capacity Possible (FILESTREAM / varbinary) Purpose-built, highly cost-effective Routes to Blob / SharePoint
Relationships Lookup columns only — no true relational model Full relational model with polymorphic lookups Full relational model None (key-value) Depends on backing store
Audit Trail Version history only Full field-level auditing Custom triggers / CDC Access logs only Custom logging
Managed Offline Sync Not supported Built-in offline profiles Custom implementation Custom implementation Custom implementation
Solution-Aware ALM Limited — lists are not solution components; ALM achievable via env variables and separate lists per environment, but manual and fragile First-class — tables, security roles, env variables External schema management External External (ARM / Bicep)
Best For Documents, small lists, file storage alongside apps Structured business data, enterprise apps, security-sensitive workloads Existing SQL estates, analytics-heavy scenarios Large files, images, media storage Enterprise integrations, microservice orchestration, hybrid architectures